(Besides, there wasnвЂ™t just one server, but 140.)ДЄn advanced investigation of an advanced hacking operation requires significantly more than just access to servers. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. ItвЂ™s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. And a close read of it all shows why TrumpвЂ™s вЂњDNC didnвЂ™t give the server to the FBIвЂќ conspiracy theory makes no sense.ДЇirst off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of RussiaвЂ™s hacking tradecraft. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. election, including by hacking into the DNC. Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. TrumpвЂ™s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Where is the dnc server